Which of the following is NOT a criterion for allocating pesticide mill assessment funds to counties?

The criterion regarding the number of counties involved in pesticide sales is not a relevant factor for the allocation of pesticide mill assessment funds to counties. This allocation process primarily focuses on the effectiveness and efficiency of the enforcement programs, the work effort by licensed personnel, and the actual usage of pesticides, all of which directly reflect the regulatory needs and priorities for pesticide safety and management within those counties.

By concentrating on elements such as the effectiveness of pesticide enforcement programs, the assessment process can ensure that funds are directed toward areas that demonstrate a need for enhanced oversight and compliance. Similarly, tracking the work hours of licensed county personnel provides insight into the labor investment made toward pesticide regulation, which is crucial for accountability in the use of the allocated funds.

Total reported usage of pesticides also serves as a vital measurement because it indicates the scale at which counties are operating and the potential risks associated with pesticide application. Thus, each of these criteria is directly tied to the goals of pest management and public safety.

In contrast, simply knowing the number of counties involved in pesticide sales does not provide actionable insight into the specific regulatory needs or effectiveness of enforcement in those areas. This makes it an irrelevant criterion in the context of allocating funds meant for pesticide oversight and management.